|
5. Use connected, decodable text for children to practice the sound-spelling relationships
they learn.
The findings of the
NICHD research emphasise that children need extensive practice applying
their knowledge of sound-spelling relationships to the task of reading
as they are learning them. This integration of phonics and reading can
only occur with the use of decodable text. Decodable text is composed
of words that use the sound-spelling correspondences that children have
learned to that point and a limited number of sight words that have been
systematically taught. As the children learn more sound-spelling correspondences,
the texts become more sophisticated in meaning, but initially they are
very limited. Only decodable text provides children the opportunity to
practice their new knowledge of sound-letter relationships in the context
of connected reading.
Texts that are less
decodable do not allow the integration of the phonological knowledge the
children gain with actual reading. For example, the first sentence children
read in a meaning-based program that added an unintegrated phonic component
was: "The dog is up." The sound-letter relationships the children had
learned up to this point were: d, m, s, r, and t. This is how much of
the sentence the children could read by applying what they had learned
in the phonic component: "___ d__ __ __". In this case, it is impossible
for the children to use their phonics knowledge to read.
Here is a different
example:
"Sam sees
a big fist." The sounds the children have learned to this point are: a,
s, m, b, t, ee, f, g, and I. This is how much of the sentence the children
can read using the sound-spelling relationships they have learned: "Sam
sees a big fist."
Decodable text is composed of words that use the sound-spelling
correspondencies that children have learned to that point and a
limited number of sight words that have been systematically taught.
|
This sentence is
100% decodable. Here the children can apply the sound-spelling relationships
they have learned to their reading of this sentence, so the phonics component
is integrated into the child's real reading. Only decodable text provides
children a context for using their new knowledge of sound-spelling relationships
in the context of real reading.
The Problem with
Guessing
Text
that is less decodable requires the children to use prediction or context
to figure out words. Much research has evaluated the effectiveness of
prediction as a strategy for word recognition. Though prediction is valuable
in comprehension for predicting the next event or predicting
an outcome, the research indicates that it is not useful in word
recognition. The following passage is a sample of authentic text (from
Jack London). The parts of the text that are omitted are the part that
a child was unable to decode accurately. The child was able to decode
approximately 80% of the text. If prediction is a useful strategy, a good
reader should be able to read this easily with understanding:
He had never
seen dogs fight as these w__ish c__ f__t, and his first ex____ t____t
him an unf______able l_____n. It is true, it was a vi___ ex______, else
he would not have lived to pr__it by it. Curly was the v____. They were
camped near the log store, where she, in her friend_ way, made ad_____
to a husky dog the size of a full-____ wolf, th____ not half so large
as _he. __ere was no w__ing, only a leap in like a flash, a met__ clip
of teeth, a leap out equal_ swift, and Curly's face was ripped open from
eye to jaw.
It was the wolf
manner of fight__, to st___ and leap away; but here was more to it than
this. Th____ or forty huskies ran -o the spot and not com___d that s____t
circle. But did not com____d that s____t in_____, not the e___ way with
which they were licking their chops. Curly rushed her ant_____,who struck
again and leaped aside. He met her next rush with his chest, in a p_____
fash___ that tum___ed her off her feet. She never re____ed them. This
was __at the on____ing huskies had w_____ for.
The use of predictable
text, rather than this authentic text, might allow children to use prediction
to figure out a passage. However, this strategy would not transfer to
real reading, as the above passage demonstrates. Predictable text gives
children false success. While this false success may be motivating for
many children, ultimately they will not be successful readers if they
rely on text predictability to read.
|